Ok, I got it working. The “Content” is actually a custom field that needs to be configured.
It’s reported at Customizing/Articles introduction - RT 5.0.3 Documentation - Best Practical
Can I recommend a link to this is added to the distribution’s README/UPGRADE files?
Thanks,
Giuseppe Sollazzo
Senior System Analyst
Member of the Open Data User Group (Cabinet Office)
Member of the Technical Standards Board (Cabinet Office)?
Member of the Health and Social Care Transparency Panel (Department of Health)
Computing Services
Information Services
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace
London SW17 0RE
gsollazz@sgul.ac.uk
+44 20 8725 5160
@sgulit
St George’s, University of London is proud to be a Stonewall Diversity Champion: ‘people perform better when they can be themselves’.From: rt-users rt-users-bounces@lists.bestpractical.com on behalf of Giuseppe Sollazzo gsollazz@sgul.ac.uk
Sent: 06 May 2015 09:10
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Upgraded 4.0.0 with RTFM 2.0 to RT 4.2 - can RTFM be removed?
Hi all,
is there anyone who has had the same issue or has any suggestion?
Or should I remove RTFM from 4.0.0 and then repeat the migration?
Thanks,
Giuseppe
Giuseppe Sollazzo
Senior System Analyst
Member of the Open Data User Group (Cabinet Office)
Member of the Technical Standards Board (Cabinet Office)?
Member of the Health and Social Care Transparency Panel (Department of Health)
Computing Services
Information Services
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace
London SW17 0RE
gsollazz@sgul.ac.uk
+44 20 8725 5160
@sgulit
St George’s, University of London is proud to be a Stonewall Diversity Champion: ‘people perform better when they can be themselves’.
From: rt-users rt-users-bounces@lists.bestpractical.com on behalf of Giuseppe Sollazzo gsollazz@sgul.ac.uk
Sent: 30 April 2015 12:07
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Upgraded 4.0.0 with RTFM 2.0 to RT 4.2 - can RTFM be removed?
Dear list,
we have upgrade our 4.0.0 to the latest 4.2, which includes an article functionality and currently testing it (it’s a clone of our live system).
On our 4.0.0, we had RTFM version 2.0 installed (although we never really used it, nor configured it) and the installation guide says this is not compatible with the auto-upgrade script. I proceeded with the 4.0.0->4.2 upgrade anyway, thinking the RTFM would just be left behind.
However, the Articles section doesn’t quite work (see screenshot with “content” not being editable, which is a clear symptom of us never having configured RTFM for use), so I suspect RTFM files are affecting the functionality.
Is there a quick fix? I don’t mind losing the RTFM 2.0 content to be honest.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards
Giuseppe Sollazzo
Senior System Analyst
Member of the Open Data User Group (Cabinet Office)
Member of the Technical Standards Board (Cabinet Office)?
Member of the Health and Social Care Transparency Panel (Department of Health)
Computing Services
Information Services
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace
London SW17 0RE
gsollazz@sgul.ac.uk
+44 20 8725 5160
@sgulit
St George’s, University of London is proud to be a Stonewall Diversity Champion: ‘people perform better when they can be themselves’.
[http://www.sgul.ac.uk/images/misc/diversity_logo_with_text.jpg]