Because of RT 2.0’s architecture, this is a much much harder feature to
implement. Mailing is handled by Scrips, not explicitly sent out
by the core. The proposed solution is a “Forward Comment” or “Forward Correspondence” option in the UI that would forward a single transaction to other
parties.
Auto-refresh wasn’t removed per set, but simply hasn’t been implemented against
the 2.x web interface yet. It’s on the list for 2.0.x features. It’s one
of the very very very few new features that will be added to 2.0.x, before
I fork the development branch that will be 2.2 and 2.0 becomes “Bugfix only”
-jOn Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:01:48AM +1000, Kim Lee wrote:
Sanity wrote:
Funny I was just going to request that also…
Me too!
Much quicker than changing it in the People/Watchers gizmo. Half the
time the cc people are only temporary so a field where you can type
in an email address or list of emails would be great (was that
feature in rt1?)Another thing missing in rt2 is the auto refresh? Why was that removed?
KL
We need to be able to enter in any email address when sending comments
or replies off to other people. It would also be nice to be able to change
the TO: field if need be. Something like an autofilled field but
changeable.On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Dirk Haenelt wrote:
Often i have the wish, that i can add a free CC by comments or replies.
Is this feasible ?regards
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users–
Cheers .^.
------------------------------------------------------------- /V
Kim Lee Senior Engineer - Bulletproof Networks // \
pri ph: +61(2)9790 8078 http://www.bulletproof.net.au/ /( )
sec ph: +61(0)416 212 025 “When failure is not an option” ^^-^^
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
jesse reed vincent – root@eruditorum.org – jesse@fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Transporters are so ungodly. if god had wanted us to travel great distances
instantaneously, he would have given us an internal
materialisation/dematerialisation control.
– Shoshe Cole