I was just curious why the CGI scripts are not viewable. Are the compiled or
something? I was really hoping that I could make mods to the scripts directly.
Thanks,
Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
The CGI scripts are C wrappers around lib/rt/ui/web/*On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 10:21:50AM -0700, Stephen J. Lawrence Jr. wrote:
I was just curious why the CGI scripts are not viewable. Are the compiled or
something? I was really hoping that I could make mods to the scripts directly.–
Thanks,Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
jesse reed vincent – jrvincent@wesleyan.edu – jesse@fsck.com
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
There are no supercomputer applications that are solvable that cannot be solved
in finite time using a fucking TRS-80 with approprite disk/tape drives. Zero.
-Tanj
It appears to be compiled from all the rt/lib/blah/subdir/blah.om files. Making
changes to the pm files will be effective immediantly (well, click 'reload’
first 
).
It’s a bit messy to root around but it does make sense after a while…
An insight into the weird and wonderful mind of Jesse?
-Feargal.
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The Communications Interactive Agency.
Phone: +353-86-8157621
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000,
Stephen J. Lawrence Jr. wrote: > I was just curious why the CGI scripts are not
viewable. Are the compiled or > something? I was really hoping that I could
make mods to the scripts directly. >
IC, that does make sense. As long as I don’t have to re-make the Makefile every
time I modify the source, I am happy. Can’t wait for the DBI usage: that is the way
to go!
Feargal Reilly wrote:
It appears to be compiled from all the rt/lib/blah/subdir/blah.om files. Making
changes to the pm files will be effective immediantly (well, click ‘reload’
first).
It’s a bit messy to root around but it does make sense after a while…
An insight into the weird and wonderful mind of Jesse?-Feargal.
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The Communications Interactive Agency.
Phone: +353-86-8157621–
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000,
Stephen J. Lawrence Jr. wrote: > I was just curious why the CGI scripts are not
viewable. Are the compiled or > something? I was really hoping that I could
make mods to the scripts directly. >–
Thanks,Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
–
Thanks,
Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
Actually, it’s compiled from suidrt.c The perl is all interpreted
at runtime. And yeah, the 1.0 code is really ugly. 2.0 is much better.
really.
jesseOn Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 08:30:07PM +0000, Feargal Reilly wrote:
It appears to be compiled from all the rt/lib/blah/subdir/blah.om files. Making
changes to the pm files will be effective immediantly (well, click ‘reload’
first
It’s a bit messy to root around but it does make sense after a while…
An insight into the weird and wonderful mind of Jesse?-Feargal.
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The Communications Interactive Agency.
Phone: +353-86-8157621–
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000,
Stephen J. Lawrence Jr. wrote: > I was just curious why the CGI scripts are not
viewable. Are the compiled or > something? I was really hoping that I could
make mods to the scripts directly. >–
Thanks,Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
–
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
jesse reed vincent – jrvincent@wesleyan.edu – jesse@fsck.com
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
They’ll take my private key when they pry it from my cold dead fingers!
Eww! DBI!!! :-0
As a BTW, if anybody is interested, I’m near complete writing a tcl/expect
interface to rt so that you can make your own forms and do lots of fun cgi
stuff with it. I’ll throw a tarball out in a day or two if anybody wants it.
-Feargal.
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The Communications Interactive Agency.
Phone: +353-86-8157621On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Stephen J. Lawrence Jr. wrote:
IC, that does make sense. As long as I don’t have to re-make the Makefile every
time I modify the source, I am happy. Can’t wait for the DBI usage: that is the way
to go!Feargal Reilly wrote:
It appears to be compiled from all the rt/lib/blah/subdir/blah.om files. Making
changes to the pm files will be effective immediantly (well, click ‘reload’
first
It’s a bit messy to root around but it does make sense after a while…
An insight into the weird and wonderful mind of Jesse?-Feargal.
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The Communications Interactive Agency.
Phone: +353-86-8157621–
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000,
Stephen J. Lawrence Jr. wrote: > I was just curious why the CGI scripts are not
viewable. Are the compiled or > something? I was really hoping that I could
make mods to the scripts directly. >–
Thanks,Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
––
Thanks,Stephen Lawrence
-Support Technician & Webmaster
-Examen, Inc.
-stephenl@examen.com
-916-921-4300 ext. 703
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users