Segmentation violation with import-1.0-to-2.0

RT Users
1

Hi,
I’m wondering if anybody has had a similar problem.
I’ve a rt-1.0.7 install with over 10,000 tickets, some of which had originally been imported from req.

I’m now trying to import them into postgres using the import tool, but after a thousand odd tickets, it craps out with a segmentation violation.

The core suggests that DBD::Pg::st failed, but my knowledge of DBD/DBI is 0.

Has this happened to anyone else?
Any suggestions?

Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.

2

Hi,
I’m wondering if anybody has had a similar problem.
I’ve a rt-1.0.7 install with over 10,000 tickets, some of which had originally been imported from req.

I’m now trying to import them into postgres using the import tool, but after a thousand odd tickets, it craps out with a segmentation violation.

The core suggests that DBD::Pg::st failed, but my knowledge of DBD/DBI is 0.

Has this happened to anyone else?
Any suggestions?

Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.

3

Upgrading to DBD::Pg 1.01 did the trick.On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:31:02 -0400 Jesse jesse@fsck.com wrote:

nod there were lots of issues with .9x DBD::Pg

On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:26:53AM +0100, Feargal Reilly wrote:

0.93, I’ll try 1.01, see if that helps.

On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:20:01 -0400 Jesse jesse@fsck.com wrote:

what version of DBD::Pg you got?

On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:07:08AM +0100, Feargal Reilly wrote:

Hi,
I’m wondering if anybody has had a similar problem.
I’ve a rt-1.0.7 install with over 10,000 tickets, some of which had originally been imported from req.

I’m now trying to import them into postgres using the import tool, but after a thousand odd tickets, it craps out with a segmentation violation.

The core suggests that DBD::Pg::st failed, but my knowledge of DBD/DBI is 0.

Has this happened to anyone else?
Any suggestions?

–
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.

–
jesse reed vincent – root@eruditorum.org – jesse@fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

I admit that X is the second worst windowing system in the world, but all the
others I’ve used are tied for first.

–
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.

–
jesse reed vincent – root@eruditorum.org – jesse@fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

And I’m told we do share some common rituals. Our “flame war” is apparently
held in person in their land and called “project meeting”.
-Alan Cox [on “Suits”]

Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.