Scrips failing - Re: Interesting

snippet from my log on a “reply”, which should have sent a response to all
watchers:

#4/9 - Scrip 24 Correspondence, other recipients
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:92)

No recipients found. Not sending.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:170)

#4/10 - Scrip 14 Transaction Updates
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:92)
[Wed Mar 5 23:26:16 2003] [debug]: Converting ‘utf-8’ to ‘us-ascii’
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm:279)

No recipients found. Not sending.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:170)----- Original Message -----
From: “Graham Freeman” graham@jahiel.net
To: rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-devel] Interesting

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Matt Knopp wrote:

Hmm, has anyone tested to see if scrips “work” with 2.1.79? The only
scrip that seems to be working for me is the global auto-reply. None of
the correspondence scrips appear to be working. Before spending any
time looking into it I figured I would ask if this was a known issue.

I can believe it’s a problem on my end, but I find it weird that the
auto-reply scrips work, where as nothing else does. Hmmm.


Matt

I have the same problem on my trial install of 2.1.75. I, too, assumed
that I didn’t set something up properly, since I’m waiting to put a lot of
time & energy into RT 3.x until it’s out of beta. My system is Red Hat
Linux 8.0 with a custom-built (but fairly vanilla) implementation of
Apache 1.3.27 and fastcgi 2.4.0. I’m using Sendmail as distributed with
RH8 for the MTA.

-Graham


rt-devel mailing list
rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

Add the line "package RT::Action::AutoOpen;"
at the top of lib/RT/Action/AutoOpen.

It’ll be fixed in tonight’s releaseOn Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:27:59PM -0800, matthew zeier wrote:

snippet from my log on a “reply”, which should have sent a response to all
watchers:

[Wed Mar 5 23:26:16 2003] [info]: rt-4-9.5.80614144622835@intelenet.net
#4/9 - Scrip 24 Correspondence, other recipients
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:92)
[Wed Mar 5 23:26:16 2003] [info]: rt-4-9.5.80614144622835@intelenet.net
No recipients found. Not sending.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:170)
[Wed Mar 5 23:26:16 2003] [info]: rt-4-10.4.35212532751649@intelenet.net
#4/10 - Scrip 14 Transaction Updates
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:92)
[Wed Mar 5 23:26:16 2003] [debug]: Converting ‘utf-8’ to ‘us-ascii’
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm:279)
[Wed Mar 5 23:26:16 2003] [info]: rt-4-10.4.35212532751649@intelenet.net
No recipients found. Not sending.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:170)

----- Original Message -----
From: “Graham Freeman” graham@jahiel.net
To: rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-devel] Interesting

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Matt Knopp wrote:

Hmm, has anyone tested to see if scrips “work” with 2.1.79? The only
scrip that seems to be working for me is the global auto-reply. None of
the correspondence scrips appear to be working. Before spending any
time looking into it I figured I would ask if this was a known issue.

I can believe it’s a problem on my end, but I find it weird that the
auto-reply scrips work, where as nothing else does. Hmmm.


Matt

I have the same problem on my trial install of 2.1.75. I, too, assumed
that I didn’t set something up properly, since I’m waiting to put a lot of
time & energy into RT 3.x until it’s out of beta. My system is Red Hat
Linux 8.0 with a custom-built (but fairly vanilla) implementation of
Apache 1.3.27 and fastcgi 2.4.0. I’m using Sendmail as distributed with
RH8 for the MTA.

-Graham


rt-devel mailing list
rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel


rt-devel mailing list
rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

http://www.bestpractical.com/rt – Trouble Ticketing. Free.