I don’t know of anyone who’s gotten RT to run on NT, but it should be possible with
a bit of hacking. I don’t know of any equivalent NT-based packages.
jesseOn Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 03:53:18PM -0400, Allen Dean wrote:
At the risk of being completely ridiculed by your group, does RT run on NT?
If so, do you have a zipped download?
If RT does not run on NT, do you have any recommendations for a package that
does. RT looks quite good.
jesse reed vincent — root@eruditorum.org — jesse@fsck.com
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
A REAL sysadmin challenge is “resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can’t focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously.”
-Nathan Mehl
RT1 probably just won’t. I don’t believe there’s anything in RT2
that would flat out prevent it. I’d actually be interested in
an NT port, if you want to contribute back makefile patches
or an install.bat or whatever the “right” thing is for 'doze.
-jOn Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:00:21PM -0500, Art Spaziano wrote:
Are there know issues which would prevent RT from running under NT ?
(other than the fact that the Makefile probably won’t work properly)
- Has anyone been successful?
Thanks in advance,
===========================================================
Art Spaziano Email: aspazian@nusphere.com
Product/Application Development Phone: (+1) 781 280
4604
Any e-mail sent to the SLA will immediately become the intellectual property
of the SLA and the author of said message will enter into a period of
indentured servitude which will last for a period of time no less than seven
years.