I just completed an installation of RT2.0.15 on RH8.0. The fact that it
had to be installed on a machine in our DMZ was more of a problem than
the fact that it was RH8.0 (no dns, no ftp out, no ssh out,…)
In fact what I did was install apache 1.3.27, but only listening on
localhost:8000. And I instructed the default apache 2 server using the
rewrite module to proxy the RT server to an SSL’ed name-virtual-host.
Seems to work fine!
Rob
Rob W.W. Hooft || rob@hooft.net || Rob
Hey I would like to know one thing
Does the Redhat 8.0 have a mod_perl installed.
Or we need to reinstall the apache like 7.2
I am about to install RT on Redhat8.0
THanks
NIranjan— Rob Hooft rob@hooft.net wrote:
I just completed an installation of RT2.0.15 on
RH8.0. The fact that it
had to be installed on a machine in our DMZ was more
of a problem than
the fact that it was RH8.0 (no dns, no ftp out, no
ssh out,…)
In fact what I did was install apache 1.3.27, but
only listening on
localhost:8000. And I instructed the default apache
2 server using the
rewrite module to proxy the RT server to an SSL’ed
name-virtual-host.
Seems to work fine!
Rob
–
Rob W.W. Hooft || rob@hooft.net ||
http://www.hooft.net/people/rob/
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at
http://fsck.com/rtfm
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
Niranjan Patel wrote:
Hey I would like to know one thing
Does the Redhat 8.0 have a mod_perl installed.
Or we need to reinstall the apache like 7.2
I am about to install RT on Redhat8.0
It’s worse: RH8 has apache 2.0.40, so you need to install 1.3.27 for RT.
OTOH, I find that mod_perl is very helpful with this.
Rob
Rob W.W. Hooft || rob@hooft.net || http://www.hooft.net/people/rob/
you mean RT doesn’t run with Apache 2.0.40
Thanks
Niranjan— Rob Hooft rob@hooft.net wrote:
Niranjan Patel wrote:
Hey I would like to know one thing
Does the Redhat 8.0 have a mod_perl installed.
Or we need to reinstall the apache like 7.2
I am about to install RT on Redhat8.0
It’s worse: RH8 has apache 2.0.40, so you need to
install 1.3.27 for RT.
OTOH, I find that mod_perl is very helpful with
this.
Rob
–
Rob W.W. Hooft || rob@hooft.net ||
http://www.hooft.net/people/rob/
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at
http://fsck.com/rtfm
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
Nope. The Apache 2.0 included in RH8 embeds an
incompatible version of mod_perl by default.
RT isn’t the only project suffering from mod
incompatibilities with Apache 2.0. I think RedHat’s
move to 2.0 was premature.
Jesse— Niranjan Patel niranjanalt@yahoo.com wrote:
you mean RT doesn’t run with Apache 2.0.40
Thanks
Niranjan
— Rob Hooft rob@hooft.net wrote:
Niranjan Patel wrote:
Hey I would like to know one thing
Does the Redhat 8.0 have a mod_perl installed.
Or we need to reinstall the apache like 7.2
I am about to install RT on Redhat8.0
It’s worse: RH8 has apache 2.0.40, so you need to
install 1.3.27 for RT.
OTOH, I find that mod_perl is very helpful with
this.
Rob
–
Rob W.W. Hooft || rob@hooft.net ||
http://www.hooft.net/people/rob/
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at
http://fsck.com/rtfm
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at
http://fsck.com/rtfm
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com