I’m writing some perl that analyzes new Incident Reports in RTIR and looks
for related Incidents that might already exist. I cannot however figure
out how to link them now because there’s no Parent/Child relationship in RT
::Client::REST. Can anyone offer some guidance on what I can do? I’m
about an hour into the coding and this is a major roadblock.
I also posted this on rt-devel but it’s not really a development of RT
issue. More like a REST interface issue. I hope it’s OK that I’m
crossposting it here.
I’m writing some perl that analyzes new Incident Reports in RTIR and looks
for related Incidents that might already exist. I cannot however figure
out how to link them now because there’s no Parent/Child relationship in RT
::Client::REST. Can anyone offer some guidance on what I can do? I’m
about an hour into the coding and this is a major roadblock.
HasMember & MemberOf should create a Parent/Child relationship shouldn’t it?
JohnOn 19/05/13 8:25 AM, Landon wrote:
Hello,
I also posted this on rt-devel but it’s not really a development of RT
issue. More like a REST interface issue. I hope it’s OK that I’m
crossposting it here.
I’m writing some perl that analyzes new Incident Reports in RTIR and
looks for related Incidents that might already exist. I cannot however
figure out how to link them now because there’s no Parent/Child
relationship in RT::Client::REST. Can anyone offer some guidance on what
I can do? I’m about an hour into the coding and this is a major roadblock.
Create a link between two tickets. A link type can be one of the
following:
* DependsOn
* DependedOnBy
* RefersTo
* ReferredToBy
* HasMember
* MemberOf
Should I have just gone ahead and used LWP or would I still have the
same problem?
HasMember & MemberOf should create a Parent/Child relationship shouldn’t
it?
Yes, those are the internal names, for better or worse. I don’t know
about the internals of RT::Client::REST, but RT’s REST interface will
accept Parent/Child types too and do the right thing.
HasMember & MemberOf should create a Parent/Child relationship shouldn’t
it?
Yes, those are the internal names, for better or worse. I don’t know
about the internals of RT::Client::REST, but RT’s REST interface will
accept Parent/Child types too and do the right thing.
Thomas
This is great to hear. Thanks very much to all of you for your replies.