Not a bug


#1

At my site we really want a new status of “QA”. Basically a developer
could clse a bug out with this status and that would alert the QA area
to test it and either marke it resolved or reopen it. I poked around a
bit in form.pm and manipulate.pm but I’m not a perl coder.


#2

One way to deal with this is to create a queue called QA and have developers
move things to that queue.On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 10:38:45PM -0400, Nicholas Christopher wrote:

At my site we really want a new status of “QA”. Basically a developer
could clse a bug out with this status and that would alert the QA area
to test it and either marke it resolved or reopen it. I poked around a
bit in form.pm and manipulate.pm but I’m not a perl coder.


Rt-devel mailing list
Rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

jesse reed vincent — root@eruditorum.orgjesse@fsck.com
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
This is scary. I’m imagining tracerouting you and seeing links like “Route
84” and “Route 9, Exit 14”. Obviously, this is illness induced.
–Cana McCoy