This was discussed on rt-dev in February 2002. See this thread for more
info: http://lists.fsck.com/pipermail/rt-devel/2002-February/002005.html .
Search the archive for the exact reasons:
http://lists.fsck.com/cgi-bin/htsearch . Quite an extensive discussion
took place on that list over the course of several weeks.
From: Marc Spitzer [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Dan Shearer
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Minor: fix for CVS/Aegis instructions
On Sat, 04 May 2002 11:03:58 +0930 (CST) Dan Shearer email@example.com wrote:
Actually, RT 2.0.x development is done in Aegis, but exported to cvs.
RT 2.1.x development is done only with Aegis, see
and work it out from there.
(and I’m not subscribed to this mailing list very often.)
why did you use aegis instead of cvs?
rt-users mailing list
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
This email message may contain information that is confidential and
proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and
any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to
protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot
guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or
that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.