I was able to install RT, but can’t get it to run.
I don’t know how to set up the apache config file to work with RT. I’m
using mod_perl 1.99 (really 2.0) and some of the directives are not the
same.
-N
I was able to install RT, but can’t get it to run.
I don’t know how to set up the apache config file to work with RT. I’m
using mod_perl 1.99 (really 2.0) and some of the directives are not the
same.
-N
Do yourself a favor and uninstall both, replacing them with older versions.
I had the same problem and installed apache 1.3, and mod_perl 1.x
something. Everything works now.
I was able to install RT, but can’t get it to run.
I don’t know how to set up the apache config file to work with RT. I’m
using mod_perl 1.99 (really 2.0) and some of the directives are not
the same.-N
rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-usersHave you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
Raymond Norton
Little Crow Telemedia Network
320-234-0270
Do yourself a favor and uninstall both, replacing them with older
versions.
I had the same problem and installed apache 1.3, and mod_perl 1.x
something. Everything works now.
On the other hand, RT 2.1.x (i.e. soon to be RT v3) has been running
with mod_perl 1.99_08 and apache 2.0.44 (and CGI 2.89) here without
problems for quite a while. Maybe you can consider an upgrade?
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
At 01:56 PM 2/03/2003 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:>On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 01:27:09PM -0600, Raymond Norton wrote:
Do yourself a favor and uninstall both, replacing them with older
versions.
I had the same problem and installed apache 1.3, and mod_perl 1.x
something. Everything works now.On the other hand, RT 2.1.x (i.e. soon to be RT v3) has been running
with mod_perl 1.99_08 and apache 2.0.44 (and CGI 2.89) here without
problems for quite a while. Maybe you can consider an upgrade?
As an Apache 2.0.43/mod_perl 1.99_07/Mason 1.17 user I haven’t experienced
any major problems - other than the 200 v 304 redirect problem in the quick
search box.
Is this overcome in bumping to the higher versions?
…or is this just a wait and see until the Mason/Mod_Perl groups resolve
this issue?
-Brook
= /// /// /// /// _/ _/ Brook Schofield =
= _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ / B.Schofield@mailbox.gu.edu.au =
= // /// _/ _/ _/ _/ // Ph: +61 7 387 53779 - WCN 0.28 =
= _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ / Directory Services Integration =
= /// / / /// /// _/ _/ Griffith University QLD 4111 =
At 01:56 PM 2/03/2003 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
Do yourself a favor and uninstall both, replacing them with older
versions.
I had the same problem and installed apache 1.3, and mod_perl 1.x
something. Everything works now.On the other hand, RT 2.1.x (i.e. soon to be RT v3) has been running
with mod_perl 1.99_08 and apache 2.0.44 (and CGI 2.89) here without
problems for quite a while. Maybe you can consider an upgrade?As an Apache 2.0.43/mod_perl 1.99_07/Mason 1.17 user I haven’t experienced
any major problems - other than the 200 v 304 redirect problem in the quick
search box.Is this overcome in bumping to the higher versions?
…or is this just a wait and see until the Mason/Mod_Perl groups resolve
this issue?
Hi,
Could you kindly tell me what this redirect problem looks like.
What I am seeing here is that when I do a quick search, I get
a second page that says “OK, the document has moved here” and
when I click here I do get the listing. Is this what you are
also seeing? Where is this described?
-Wash
Odhiambo Washington wash@wananchi.com “The box said ‘Requires
Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,’
Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922 so I installed FreeBSD.”
GSM: +254 72 743223 +254 733 744121 This sig is McQ!
Rules:
(1) The boss is always right.
(2) When the boss is wrong, refer to rule 1.