Gerneralization of Scrips system

The Asset Tracker system is going to need to support
scrips (but probably not in the 0.1 release). Looking
at the Scrips table it seems the scrips system needs
to be generalized away from just queues. Probably the
Queue field needs to become an Instance field and a
Domain field needs to be added.

Any thoughts before I get too involved with creating
patches to make it happen?

-Todd

The Asset Tracker system is going to need to support
scrips (but probably not in the 0.1 release). Looking
at the Scrips table it seems the scrips system needs
to be generalized away from just queues. Probably the
Queue field needs to become an Instance field and a
Domain field needs to be added.

Any thoughts before I get too involved with creating
patches to make it happen?

What kind of conditions/actions are you needing? Wouldn’t this be a
good use for the new attributes table?

Andy Harrison

I need scrips for something other than queues, so the Scrips
table is the natural choice.

-ToddOn Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:08:39PM -0500, Andy Harrison wrote:

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:09:50 -0500, Todd Chapman rt@chaka.net wrote:

The Asset Tracker system is going to need to support
scrips (but probably not in the 0.1 release). Looking
at the Scrips table it seems the scrips system needs
to be generalized away from just queues. Probably the
Queue field needs to become an Instance field and a
Domain field needs to be added.

Any thoughts before I get too involved with creating
patches to make it happen?

What kind of conditions/actions are you needing? Wouldn’t this be a
good use for the new attributes table?


Andy Harrison

I need scrips for something other than queues, so the Scrips
table is the natural choice.

-Todd

I meant the attributes table for the asset data itself. That would
make it easily available to a scrip, but I don’t know what kind of
stuff you’re looking to do with the scrips.

Andy Harrison