How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
disclaimers on ticket replies?
I’m wondering if we should be including it with every reply, just the
auto response or just in the first reply. Or if we can just include t as
an attachment automatically to keep the email thread clear off junk.
boilerplates in email havent been too huge a problem for us.
if i had to find a way to add boilerplates to RT, i would add a second
transport in my postfix designed to omit plates as they end up in RT, and
simply add the boilerplate as a login message at start of RT only.On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Alex Young wrote:
How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
disclaimers on ticket replies?
I’m wondering if we should be including it with every reply, just the
auto response or just in the first reply. Or if we can just include t as
an attachment automatically to keep the email thread clear off junk.
How is everyone dealing with their standard corporate email legal
disclaimers on ticket replies?
MTA? (should work for normal emails too)
I personally hate them They have no other legal value than make
stupid people scared to sue for whatever reason. At least in most
European countries that is the case. But then, people sue other people
much less for stupid reasons than other side of the Atlantic