Heya,
We’ve currently planning on shifting RT’s repository from Subversion
to Git. I’ve completed a preliminary version of the conversion, and
have made it available via github[1]. Feedback is apprciated; since
this is temporary home for it, though, don’t get too attached to any
clones you make of it.
Heya,
We’ve currently planning on shifting RT’s repository from Subversion
to Git. I’ve completed a preliminary version of the conversion, and
have made it available via github[1]. Feedback is apprciated; since
this is temporary home for it, though, don’t get too attached to any
clones you make of it.
nice to hear we are close to switch to git 
I had a look, everythink seems ok, branch are there as well as tags. Log
is ok if we change from one branch to another.
seems you did a good conversion 
just one thing, don’t you think, that naming branches just by the
release number should be enough (without “-trunk”) ?
Heya,
I’ve updated http://github.com/alexmv/rt-final-preview to include older
history culled from CVS and Aegis repositories, so we now have unbroken
commit history stretching back into 1997.On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 07:35 +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
just one thing, don’t you think, that naming branches just by the
release number should be enough (without “-trunk”) ?
I think it helps distinguish them from the tag names a bit, but there’s
no particularly strong reason for the naming scheme.