Redundancy in the web UI

I am using 2-0-11.

In the “25 highest priority tickets I requested…” box, There is the ticket
name, which is a link to the ‘Display’ function. On the right hand side of
the box, there is a “Display” link for each ticket, which also calls the
’Display’ function.

I think it would be good to remove the second ‘Display’ link, on the right
side of the box.

Would you rather I just submitted these via the rt system, and then supplied a
patch to fulfill them? I bring them up here because I know there is a ton
more rt experience here than what I have, and I would like to know when I am
flying off in the wrong direction only because I am lacking your experience.
I would also like to hear from Jesse that he won’t accept my work before I do
it. :slight_smile:

rob

Submit a patch and rationale to rt-2.0-bugs. This seems to make sense.
I’d actually meant to twiddle that to an “update” button. Would that
make more sense?

-jOn Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 12:35:34AM -0600, Rob Walker wrote:

I am using 2-0-11.

In the “25 highest priority tickets I requested…” box, There is the ticket
name, which is a link to the ‘Display’ function. On the right hand side of
the box, there is a “Display” link for each ticket, which also calls the
’Display’ function.

I think it would be good to remove the second ‘Display’ link, on the right
side of the box.

Would you rather I just submitted these via the rt system, and then supplied a
patch to fulfill them? I bring them up here because I know there is a ton
more rt experience here than what I have, and I would like to know when I am
flying off in the wrong direction only because I am lacking your experience.
I would also like to hear from Jesse that he won’t accept my work before I do
it. :slight_smile:

rob


rt-devel mailing list
rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt – Trouble Ticketing. Free.

Submit a patch and rationale to rt-2.0-bugs. This seems to make sense.
I’d actually meant to twiddle that to an “update” button. Would that
make more sense?

Yes, will do. I don’t see a rt-2.0-bugs in the RT/fsck.com site.

rob

email to rt-2.0-bugs@fsck.com. The queue is called "RT Bugs"On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 09:26:40AM -0800, Rob Walker wrote:

On Saturday 09 February 2002 22:20, Jesse Vincent wrote:

Submit a patch and rationale to rt-2.0-bugs. This seems to make sense.
I’d actually meant to twiddle that to an “update” button. Would that
make more sense?

Yes, will do. I don’t see a rt-2.0-bugs in the RT/fsck.com site.

rob


rt-devel mailing list
rt-devel@lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt – Trouble Ticketing. Free.