R6515 - rt/branches/3.6-RELEASE/lib/RT/I18N

Hi.

I thought it removes only strings that have ‘not found in source’
marker. Arkadiusz, why do you delete some messages even if they are
still used in the code? I’m going to revert this changes until you
describe a reason.On 11/25/06, Reed Loden reed@reedloden.com wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:22:32 -0500 (EST) ruz@bestpractical.com wrote:

Author: ruz
Date: Fri Nov 24 16:22:32 2006
New Revision: 6515

Modified:
rt/branches/3.6-RELEASE/lib/RT/I18N/pl.po

Log:

  • Polish translation, thanks to Arkadiusz Miskiewicz

Huh?

This patch removes the polish translation.

~reed


Reed Loden - reed@reedloden.com


Rt-commit mailing list
Rt-commit@lists.bestpractical.com
rt-commit Info Page

Best regards, Ruslan.

http://svn.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi/bps/revision/?rev=6515On 11/25/06, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz arekm@pld-linux.org wrote:

On Friday 24 November 2006 23:49, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:

Hi.

I thought it removes only strings that have ‘not found in source’
marker. Arkadiusz, why do you delete some messages even if they are
still used in the code? I’m going to revert this changes until you
describe a reason.

Please, point me to a exact committed diff (websvn?) so I’ll comment.

On 11/25/06, Reed Loden reed@reedloden.com wrote:

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:22:32 -0500 (EST) ruz@bestpractical.com wrote:

Author: ruz
Date: Fri Nov 24 16:22:32 2006
New Revision: 6515

Modified:
rt/branches/3.6-RELEASE/lib/RT/I18N/pl.po

Log:

  • Polish translation, thanks to Arkadiusz Miskiewicz

Huh?

This patch removes the polish translation.

~reed


Reed Loden - reed@reedloden.com


Rt-commit mailing list
Rt-commit@lists.bestpractical.com
rt-commit Info Page


Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

Best regards, Ruslan.

I thought it removes only strings that have ‘not found in source’
marker. Arkadiusz, why do you delete some messages even if they are
still used in the code? I’m going to revert this changes until you
describe a reason.

This might be true, but at first glance, the patch looks like it
removes way more than it adds or changes. While I haven’t looked at
that code lately, some of the strings look like they still might be in
use.

~reed

Reed Loden - reed@reedloden.com