R16536 - in rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS: etc

It shouldn’t include “new”. This change will break some logic. Is
there any problems with that I should be aware of?On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:52 AM, sunnavy@bestpractical.com wrote:

Author: sunnavy
Date: Sat Oct 25 03:52:28 2008
New Revision: 16536

Modified:
rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/ (props changed)
rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata

Log:
r17396@sunnavys-mb: sunnavy | 2008-10-25 15:20:21 +0800
active should include new

Modified: rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata

— rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata (original)
+++ rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata Sat Oct 25 03:52:28 2008
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@
content => {
default => {
initial => [‘new’],

  •        active   => ['open', 'stalled'],
    
  •        active   => [ 'new', 'open', 'stalled'],
          inactive => ['resolved', 'rejected', 'deleted'],
          transitions => {
              new      => [qw(open resolved rejected deleted)],
    

Rt-commit mailing list
Rt-commit@lists.bestpractical.com
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-commit

Best regards, Ruslan.