Journal Functions in 3.0.9

I know this was mentioned some few weeks ago, but I have been looking at this.

Bearing in mind the caveat that Journalling is limited to a ‘blogging’ tool right now, that could still be useful.

The problem seems to be Post.html which contains:

<Form Action="post" Method="POST" .......

There doesn’t seem to be a correspnding action ‘post’ and so it fails.

Anyone know how to solve this?

Richard,

There should be a file called “post” in the html/journal directory of
the journal tarball. At least, it was in mine and I am using a modified
journal-0.1. In fact, I don’t have a Post.html at all. What version of
the journal extension are you using and where did you find it?

Matt Disney

Richard Ellis wrote:

The short version is that that’s a proof of concept that I’m working on
making slightly more usefl in the 3.1 timeframe.

JesseOn Feb 29, 2004, at 5:33 AM, Richard Ellis wrote:

I know this was mentioned some few weeks ago, but I have been looking
at this.

Bearing in mind the caveat that Journalling is limited to a ‘blogging’
tool right now, that could still be useful.

The problem seems to be Post.html which contains:

<Form Action="post" Method="POST" .......

There doesn’t seem to be a correspnding action ‘post’ and so it fails.

Anyone know how to solve this?


rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
The rt-users Archives

Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm

Hi Matt,

It’s not in the version that comes built into the current RT distro. The
project Manager has seen that its there and want me to get it working or
remove it completely and I’d rather not have to hack the programme
around to remove it. If it simply adds a limited blog, similar to the
todo list, then that would be sufficient for now.

I have been through both the 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 builds I have here and
there isn’t a post file, but there is a Post.html file.

If their is a working version of Journal, no matter how limited, I’d
appreciate knowing where it is.

Thanks
RikOn Sun, 2004-02-29 at 13:55, Matt Disney wrote:

Richard,

There should be a file called “post” in the html/journal directory of
the journal tarball. At least, it was in mine and I am using a modified
journal-0.1. In fact, I don’t have a Post.html at all. What version of
the journal extension are you using and where did you find it?

Matt Disney

Richard Ellis wrote:

I know this was mentioned some few weeks ago, but I have been looking at this.

Bearing in mind the caveat that Journalling is limited to a
‘blogging’ tool right now, that could still be useful.

The problem seems to be Post.html which contains:

<Form Action="post" Method="POST" .......

There doesn’t seem to be a correspnding action ‘post’ and so it fails.

Anyone know how to solve this?


rt-users mailing list
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
The rt-users Archives

Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
Rick Ellis Richard.Ellis@Sun.COM

Hi Matt,

It’s not in the version that comes built into the current RT distro.
The
project Manager has seen that its there and want me to get it working
or
remove it completely and I’d rather not have to hack the programme
around to remove it. If it simply adds a limited blog, similar to the
todo list, then that would be sufficient for now.

I have been through both the 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 builds I have here and
there isn’t a post file, but there is a Post.html file.

It’s not included in RT 3.0.8 or 3.0.9 because it’s not done yet. If
you need it on an accelerated schedule, please contact me off list.

I’m using is this stuff, with modifications:
http://www.fsck.com/pub/rt/devel/journal-0.1.tgz

I honestly don’t recommend using it, though, unless you don’t mind
spending some time to make it work, look the way you want, and do what
you want. And remember that when Jesse is done with the real RT
journal offering it will undoubtedly be different in some ways than the
solution you’ve implemented, so you should be sure you’re okay with
adapting to that when he rolls it out if you’re going to use a
development offering beforehand.

Matt Disney

Jesse Vincent wrote: