Heads Up: DBD::Pg 1.40

RT Users
1

DBD::Pg changed their statement prepare semantic to be…less
flexible and intelligent. Consequently, DBD::Pg 1.40 doesn’t currently
work with RT.

Jesse
2

DBD::Pg changed their statement prepare semantic to be…less
flexible and intelligent. Consequently, DBD::Pg 1.40 doesn’t currently
work with RT.

Indeed. :slight_smile:

(That’s 3 hours of my life you’re seeing there, folks.)

CPAN still has 1.32, and that does work correctly.

Cheers,
– jra
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274

  If you can read this... thank a system adminstrator.  Or two.  --me
3

CPAN still has 1.32, and that does work correctly.

For some definition of “correct”. I am still stuck with 1.22.

Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
+1-301-869-4449 x806

4

CPAN still has 1.32, and that does work correctly.

For some definition of “correct”. I am still stuck with 1.22.

To clarify, 1.32 allows it to install and run.

Cheers,
– jra
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274

  If you can read this... thank a system adminstrator.  Or two.  --me
5

Spam detection software, running on the system “mail.bestunion.it”, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn’t spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview: Jesse Vincent wrote: > DBD::Pg changed their statement
prepare semantic to be…less > flexible and intelligent. Consequently,
DBD::Pg 1.40 doesn’t currently > work with RT. > > Jesse What about
the freshly released version 1.41? […]

Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description

0.5 FS_DOUBLE_CONST FS_DOUBLE_CONST
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4424]
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[151.37.28.91 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[151.37.28.91 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[151.37.28.91 listed in combined.njabl.org]

6

Jesse Vincent wrote:

DBD::Pg changed their statement prepare semantic to be…less
flexible and intelligent. Consequently, DBD::Pg 1.40 doesn’t currently
work with RT.

Jesse

I assume it is fixed now:
https://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=11744

Do CPAN run RT on Postgres? That would be ironic…

Rainer