Back to mod_perl?

RT Users
1

Now that it’s generally agreed that the attachment corruption issue has
been solved, i’m wondering if i should go back to mod_perl from FastCGI.
Do you think mod_perl is faster?

Ideally, even, i’d like to use a single install of Apache 2.0 from RPMs
rather than a custom-compiled Apache 1.3.29. Has mod_perl 2.x reached
any level of stability wrt RT yet?

Thanks,
mike

2

Mike White wrote:

Now that it’s generally agreed that the attachment corruption issue has
been solved, i’m wondering if i should go back to mod_perl from FastCGI.
Do you think mod_perl is faster?
Don’t know really(I use mp1), but wish to know too.

Ideally, even, i’d like to use a single install of Apache 2.0 from RPMs
rather than a custom-compiled Apache 1.3.29. Has mod_perl 2.x reached
any level of stability wrt RT yet?
mp2 from Distributors still suck.
Make your own Apache1 rpm spec.